5 Things the NHL Should Steal From Olympic Hockey

No Fighting Would Clean Up Penalty Markets

International play prohibits fighting. The NHL allows it and even encourages it with "game-management violence."

If the NHL banned fighting, penalty markets would become cleaner for bettors because majors become rarer and more rules-based.

Why no fighting helps bettors:

• Fighting majors are unpredictable (you can't model when a fight will happen)
• Game-management violence creates arbitrary penalty calls (refs manage games with makeup calls)
• Banning fighting makes penalty markets cleaner (fewer random 5-minute majors)
• Books could price penalty props more accurately (less variance from fighting)

If the NHL banned fighting, penalty props and power-play props would be more bettable. You could model penalty calls based on actual infractions, not random fights.

Hockey moves fast. So do our picks. The Content Lab has the angles you actually need.

True Sudden Death OT in the Finals

Olympic gold medal games are played in full 5-on-5 periods until a winner. No gimmicks. No shootouts. True sudden death.

The NHL Finals use the same format, but regular season and early playoff rounds use 3-on-3 OT and shootouts. That's a gimmick ending that doesn't belong in championship hockey.

Why true sudden death OT is better:

• Full 5-on-5 OT is a better product (no gimmicks)
• It would reshape live totals and OT props (books would have to reprice OT probability)
• Shootouts are coin flips (not representative of actual team quality)
• True sudden death rewards the better team (not the luckiest shootout)

If the NHL adopted true sudden death OT for all playoff rounds, OT props would become more predictable. Books could price OT probability based on team quality, not shootout variance.

Think you can predict the chaos? Try Gridzy and prove it. Build your grid. Call your shots. It's free.

Tournament-Style Roster Clarity Reduces Betting Chaos

Olympic rosters are clear. Men can carry up to 25 players. Women up to 23. No ambiguity around scratches or extra skaters.

The NHL roster rules are messier. Teams can call up players, send down players, and scratch players with minimal notice. That creates chaos for lineup-driven betting.

Why tournament-style roster clarity helps bettors:

• You know exactly who's available (no surprise scratches)
• Lineup-driven betting becomes less chaotic (you can model matchups accurately)
• Books can price props more accurately (less variance from surprise lineup changes)

If the NHL adopted tournament-style roster clarity, props on depth players would be more bettable. You'd know who's playing before you lock in your bet.

Before puck drop, check the Content Lab for the sharp side.

Standardized Rink Specs for Better Projections

Milano Cortina 2026 ice is set at 60.0 m × 26.0 m, roughly 196.85 ft × 85.3 ft. That's close to NHL width (200 ft × 85 ft).

Standardized rink specs narrow the "ice-size excuse" and make cross-league performance projections more reliable.

Why standardized rinks help bettors:

• Players can't blame ice size for underperformance (no excuses)
• Cross-league projections become more accurate (Olympic performance translates to NHL)
• Books can price player props based on actual skill, not ice-size variance

If the NHL and international hockey used the same ice size, player props would be more predictable. You could model performance based on skill, not environmental factors.

If you're betting goalies and totals, start in the Content Lab.

Overtime Rules That Scale With Stakes

Olympic overtime rules scale with stakes. Early rounds use short 3-on-3 then shootout. Later rounds extend OT to full 5-on-5 sudden death.

The NHL uses the same OT format for all games. That doesn't make sense. A regular season game in November shouldn't have the same OT rules as Game 7 of the Finals.

Why scaling OT rules makes sense:

• Early-round games can end quickly (3-on-3, shootout)
• High-stakes games get true sudden death (5-on-5, no gimmicks)
• Creates a more consistent "risk ladder" that bettors can model by round

If the NHL adopted scaling OT rules, OT props would become more bettable. You could model OT probability based on the round, not just team quality.

If you're feeling confident about tonight's slate, Gridzy is waiting.

How These Changes Would Affect NHL Betting

If the NHL adopted all five Olympic rules, the betting market would change in three ways.

Penalty markets would become cleaner. No fighting means fewer random majors. Books could price penalty props more accurately.

OT props would become more predictable. True sudden death OT in high-stakes games means you can model OT probability based on team quality, not gimmicks.

Lineup-driven betting would become less chaotic. Tournament-style roster clarity means you know who's playing before you bet.

The first season after these changes would create massive inefficiencies. Books would be repricing everything. Sharp bettors who understand the new rules would clean up.

No puck tonight? Piggy Arcade's top casino picks are live.

The Bottom Line on Olympic Rules in the NHL

The NHL should steal five things from Olympic hockey: no fighting, true sudden death OT, tournament-style roster clarity, standardized rink specs, and OT rules that scale with stakes.

These changes would clean up penalty markets, make OT props more predictable, and reduce lineup-driven betting chaos.

The first season after these changes would create massive betting inefficiencies. Books would be repricing everything. Sharp bettors who understand the new rules would profit.

Don't expect these changes anytime soon. The NHL is slow to adopt new rules. But if they do, be ready to exploit the inefficiencies.

When the ice goes quiet, Piggy Arcade keeps the lights on. Switch from slapshots to slot spins in one click.