NHL

Are the Bruins Rebuilding or Reloading? Futures Say a Lot

Boston's futures profile screams "volatile retool," not full teardown. The Hockey News framed them as boom-or-bust with long odds: +20,000 Cup, +8,000 East, +10,000 Atlantic, and even a modest +375 to make the playoffs. Numbers that basically price them as an outside playoff candidate rather than a contender. But The Athletic's preview highlights why the "reload" argument still exists. If Boston gets top-end seasons from Pastrnak, McAvoy, and Swayman, they have foundational pieces at forward, defense, and goal that many rebuild teams don't.

·
February 23, 2026
·

The Futures Say Boston Is an Outside Playoff Candidate

Boston's odds tell you everything about how the market views them. +20,000 to win the Cup. +8,000 to win the East. +10,000 to win the Atlantic. +375 to make the playoffs.

Those are the odds of a team that's not expected to contend. Books are pricing them as a fringe playoff team at best, a lottery team at worst.

The factors driving Boston's long odds:

  • Depth pieces left in free agency or got old
  • The roster is thin beyond Pastrnak, McAvoy, and Swayman
  • The Atlantic Division is stacked (Florida, Toronto, Tampa are all better)

Books don't see Boston as a contender. They see them as a team in transition, trying to figure out if they're rebuilding or reloading.

Hockey moves fast. So do our picks. The Content Lab has the angles you actually need.

The "Reload" Argument: Pastrnak, McAvoy, Swayman

The case for Boston reloading, not rebuilding, is that they have foundational pieces at forward, defense, and goal.

David Pastrnak is one of the best goal scorers in hockey. Charlie McAvoy is an elite two-way defenseman. Jeremy Swayman is a legitimate starting goalie. That's a better core than most rebuilding teams have.

If all three have top-end seasons, Boston can compete:

  • Pastrnak scoring 45+ goals
  • McAvoy playing 25+ minutes and shutting down top lines
  • Swayman posting a .920+ save percentage

The problem is depth and lineup insulation. If any one of those three has an off year or gets injured, Boston collapses. They don't have the depth to survive adversity.

Think you can predict the chaos? Try Gridzy and prove it. Build your grid. Call your shots. It's free.

The Depth Problem Is Why Books Are Skeptical

The issue for Boston is depth. Futures markets punish teams without depth because it shows up over 82 games and in playoff injuries.

If Pastrnak, McAvoy, or Swayman miss 20 games, Boston is toast. They don't have the depth to overcome injuries to any of their core three.

The depth factors that keep Boston's odds long:

  • Thin forward group beyond Pastrnak
  • Limited defensive depth behind McAvoy
  • No proven backup goalie if Swayman gets injured

Books price this risk into Boston's futures. +375 to make the playoffs reflects a team that's dependent on three players staying healthy and performing at elite levels for 82 games. That's a lot of variance.

Before puck drop, check the Content Lab for the sharp side.

If You Think They're Reloading, Bet "Make Playoffs"

If you think Boston is reloading, the value usually isn't Cup futures at +20,000. It's "make playoffs" if you can find a price that implies the market is too pessimistic about their defensive and goalie floor.

+375 to make the playoffs implies roughly a 21% probability. If you believe Boston has a 35% to 40% chance to make the playoffs (Pastrnak, McAvoy, and Swayman keep them competitive), +375 is value.

The logic is simple:

  • Boston's defensive and goalie floor is higher than books are pricing
  • They might not be a contender, but they can beat up on bad teams and sneak into a wild card spot
  • +375 underprices that possibility

If you think they're reloading, bet "make playoffs." If you think they're rebuilding, fade them entirely.

If you're feeling confident about tonight's slate, Gridzy is waiting.

If You Think They're Rebuilding, Fade Early-Season Optimism

If you think Boston is rebuilding, the smart play is fading early-season optimism and hunting division unders and point-total unders.

Casual bettors see "Bruins" and think "historic franchise, they'll figure it out." They bet Boston to make the playoffs at +375. Sharp bettors know the depth isn't there and fade them.

The fade strategy looks like this:

  • Bet Boston point-total under (books might set it at 92.5, you bet under because the depth isn't there)
  • Fade Boston in division futures (they're not winning the Atlantic over Florida, Toronto, or Tampa)
  • Bet against Boston in early-season games when casual bettors are still optimistic

Early-season optimism always fades when the depth problems become obvious. If you think Boston is rebuilding, fade the optimism before the market corrects.

No puck tonight? Piggy Arcade's top casino picks are live.

The Bottom Line on Boston's Futures

Boston's futures say they're in volatile retool mode. Not full rebuild, not legitimate contender. Somewhere in between.

If you think they're reloading, bet "make playoffs" at +375. The defensive and goalie floor is higher than books are pricing. If you think they're rebuilding, fade early-season optimism and bet point-total unders.

The depth problem is real. Boston is dependent on Pastrnak, McAvoy, and Swayman all staying healthy and performing at elite levels. That's a lot of variance. Books price that risk into their futures.

The edge is deciding whether you believe in the reload or the rebuild, then betting accordingly.

When the ice goes quiet, Piggy Arcade keeps the lights on. Switch from slapshots to slot spins in one click.

Share this post:

Minimum Juice. Maximum Profits.

We sniff out edges so you don’t have to. Spend less. Win more.

RELATED POSTS

Check out the latest picks from Shurzy AI and our team of experts.