The Comeback Tour That Could Shock a Division

Conor McGregor Hasn't Won MMA Fight Since October 2016

Conor McGregor's potential comeback is the most commercially significant and competitively questionable return scenario in the sport.

McGregor has not won an MMA fight since October 2016, nearly a decade of losses, suspensions, injuries, legal issues, and cryptic social media posts separating the sport's most commercially significant athlete from its competitive present.

The reported return timeline (July 11, 2026, at International Fight Week in Las Vegas) gives McGregor a minimum four-month preparation window from current date, which is meaningful but not sufficient to fully compensate for years of competitive inactivity.

The fight that makes the most commercial sense, provides the most winnable path, and still generates maximum buzz is Michael Chandler. Whether the UFC can coordinate both sides into an agreement before July is the operational challenge that has stymied this matchup for two years already.

McGregor comeback factors:

• Last MMA win October 2016, nearly decade away
• July 11, 2026 return gives four-month prep window
• Not sufficient to compensate for years of inactivity
• Chandler makes most commercial sense, most winnable path

The honest analytical odds for a McGregor return are considerably more modest than the market prices suggest. A fighter inactive for five-plus years, aging from prime athletic condition, with documented injury history and a training camp that operates on its own schedule, returning against anyone in the top 10 of his natural weight class should be priced as an underdog or at even money at best.

Before fight night, hit the Content Lab. Styles make fights. We break them down fast.

Amanda Nunes Retired After Peña Loss, Hinted Multiple Returns

Amanda Nunes retired after losing to Julianna Peña but has hinted multiple times at a return, and Valentina Shevchenko has explicitly said she would return to bantamweight if Nunes officially comes back.

Their historical rivalry (two losses by Shevchenko in close, competitive fights) creates the rematch structure where Shevchenko's evolution since those bouts (she has not lost since Nunes dominated her in 2017) could produce a definitive reversal.

At 37 and 36 respectively, the fight has a natural urgency that makes delay irrational from every perspective. If Nunes returns in 2026, she faces either Shevchenko in the superfight or a newer generation of bantamweights who have developed specifically to exploit the technical gaps Nunes showed in her final fights before retirement.

Nunes comeback scenario:

• Retired after Peña loss, hinted multiple returns
• Shevchenko would return to bantamweight if Nunes comes back
• Two Shevchenko losses in close fights, hasn't lost since 2017
• Ages 37 and 36 create natural urgency

The betting edge exists in identifying whether Nunes' return is motivated by competitive hunger (in which case her championship experience and fight IQ remain valuable) or financial necessity (in which case her physical decline from retirement makes her overpriced based on legacy reputation).

Think you can call the main event? Try Gridzy. Make your picks. Flex later.

Jon Jones Retired June 2025, Reversed Within Weeks

Jon Jones announced his retirement from MMA on June 21, 2025, confirmed first by Dana White, then by Jones himself. Within weeks, he reversed course and announced his intention to return in 2026. By February 2026, he was hinting at a second retirement.

The uncertainty about whether Jones will fight again is almost perfectly symbolic of a career defined by what he did to opponents in the octagon and what he did to his own legacy outside of it.

If Jones returns healthy and both fighters are at their physical peaks, the uncertainty about whether Jones' legendary IQ and experience can compensate for significant age and inactivity disadvantage against a physically superior opponent (Tom Aspinall) is genuine and unresolvable until the first exchange lands.

Jones comeback uncertainty:

• Retired June 21, 2025, reversed within weeks
• By February 2026 hinting at second retirement
• If returns vs. Aspinall, age and inactivity vs. legendary IQ
• Uncertainty genuine, unresolvable until first exchange

The Jones-Aspinall fight is not about money or public demand. It is about whether Jones' GOAT claim requires validation against the era's premier heavyweight, or whether his light heavyweight body of work is so comprehensive that the heavyweight chapter is merely supplementary.

If you're feeling bold about that underdog, prove it in Gridzy.

Khabib Nurmagomedov Retired Undefeated, Zero Comeback Hints

Khabib Nurmagomedov retired undefeated after defeating Justin Gaethje in October 2020, and unlike every other major retirement in UFC history, he has given zero credible hints of a comeback.

His retirement was motivated by a promise to his mother after his father's death, creating a personal and cultural context that makes a return significantly less likely than financial or competitive motivations would suggest.

However, if Khabib were to return (hypothetically, for a superfight against someone like Islam Makhachev or a legacy-defining bout), the betting market would experience the single largest line inflation event in UFC history. The public belief in Khabib's invincibility remains so strong that he would open as a -400 or larger favorite against virtually anyone at lightweight or welterweight.

Khabib comeback (hypothetical):

• Retired undefeated October 2020, zero credible hints
• Motivated by promise to mother after father's death
• Personal/cultural context makes return less likely
• If returned, would open -400 or larger vs. virtually anyone

The analytical edge for bettors would exist on the opponent, who would be systematically underpriced based on public nostalgia for Khabib's dominance without accounting for three-plus years of ring rust and physical decline from athletic prime.

After the final bell, Piggy Arcade keeps the action rolling.

Georges St-Pierre Comeback in Late 30s Provides Historical Template

Georges St-Pierre's comeback at 36 years old provides the historical template for evaluating how elite fighters age and whether championship-level performance persists through extended absence.

GSP retired in 2013, returned in 2017 to challenge Michael Bisping for the middleweight title, won via submission in the third round, then retired again. The four-year gap between retirement and return didn't diminish his technical superiority or fight IQ, but the weight class change (welterweight to middleweight) masked some of the physical decline that staying at 170 would have exposed.

The lesson for evaluating 2026 comebacks: fighters returning at a higher weight class (where size and power matter more than speed and cardio) age more gracefully than those returning at their original weight where younger, faster athletes have emerged.

GSP template lessons:

• Retired 2013, returned 2017 at age 36
• Four-year gap didn't diminish technical superiority or IQ
• Weight class change to middleweight masked physical decline
• Fighters returning at higher weight class age more gracefully

No PPV tonight? Piggy Arcade's top picks are live. From knockouts to jackpots in one click.

Market Systematically Overprices Legacy-Based Comebacks

The betting market systematically overprices legacy-based comebacks because casual bettors anchor on the fighter's historical achievements without adequately discounting for time away and physical decline.

When a legendary champion returns after two-plus years, the opening line reflects their championship accomplishments rather than their current competitive quality. This creates systematic value on opponents who are active, in their prime, and facing a fighter whose skills have degraded in ways the market hasn't priced.

The practical betting rule: when a retired champion returns after 18+ months against an active top-10 opponent, the opponent represents value unless specific evidence exists that the returning fighter has maintained elite training and competitive sharpness during the absence.

Legacy comeback overpricing:

• Market anchors on historical achievements not current quality
• Opening line reflects championship accomplishments
• Creates value on active, prime opponents
• Practical rule: opponent represents value after 18+ months unless evidence of elite training maintained

Before fight night, hit the Content Lab. Styles make fights. We break them down fast.

The Bottom Line on Comeback Tour Shocking Division

Comeback tours create line inflation market exploits: McGregor hasn't won since October 2016 (should price underdog or even vs. top 10), Nunes hinted multiple returns ages 37 (edge exists identifying competitive hunger vs. financial necessity), Jones reversed June 2025 retirement within weeks (age and inactivity vs. legendary IQ unresolvable), market systematically overprices legacy-based comebacks anchoring on history not current quality.