UFC Betting Explained: Best UFC Stats Websites

For UFC betting, the best stats sites fall into three tiers: official UFC data, independent MMA databases and rankings, and advanced analytics and odds tools. Each solves a different problem. Raw numbers, opponent-quality context, or pricing insights.

Most bettors use one site (usually UFCStats.com) and call it research. Sharp bettors layer multiple databases to build complete fighter profiles. Official stats tell you what happened. Independent databases tell you whether what happened was against elite competition or regional journeymen. Odds tools tell you whether the market has priced in what you've discovered.

The edge isn't in any single site. It's in systematically combining them to answer questions the public never asks.

Read more: The Complete Guide to UFC Betting Tools, Tape Study Resources & Databases

Tier 1: Core UFC Statistics (Must-Haves)

Start here. These are the foundational databases every UFC bettor needs.

UFCStats.com: The Official Source

UFCStats.com is the official statistics site for UFC fights since UFC 28, with full event and fighter data. This is the UFC's own tracking system, which means it's comprehensive and authoritative for anything that happened inside the octagon.

Key features:

Per-fight stats break down significant strikes by area and target, takedowns, control time, and submission attempts. Fighter pages show career averages, striking and grappling splits, and complete fight history. Event pages provide results with method and round of victory for every fight.

Why bettors use it: This is your baseline quantitative foundation. Check pace (strikes per minute), accuracy percentages, takedown defense, and cardio proxies (does output drop in Round 3?). If a fighter averages 4.2 significant strikes per minute and their opponent allows 5.8 strikes per minute, you've identified a volume mismatch before watching any tape.

How to use it correctly: Don't just look at career averages. Check the last 5 fights for trends. Is striking output declining? Has takedown defense improved? Career averages include their debut fight seven years ago. Recent trends predict better than career totals.

Cross-reference both fighters. A wrestler with 75% takedown accuracy sounds elite until you see their opponent has 85% takedown defense. Context matters more than raw numbers.

Shurzy Tip: UFCStats.com shows you what happened but not against whom. A fighter with high striking numbers might have faced three opponents with terrible defense. Always cross-reference with opponent quality databases like Fight Matrix.

UFC Record Book: All-Time Context

The UFC Record Book (StatLeaders.UFC.com) provides all-time statistical leaders by category including total fights, knockdowns, takedowns, control time, and more. It's filterable by weight class, fighter status (active or retired), and era.

Key features: Individual fighter career records with expanded detail, combined fight records and single-round records for deep dives, and historical performance benchmarks across the entire UFC history.

Why bettors use it: Quickly see whether someone's volume, durability, or control time is elite or just "good." Jim Miller leads all-time with 46 UFC fights. That veteran experience translates differently than a prospect with 4 UFC fights, even if their recent stats look similar.

Compare fighters within divisions. If a lightweight has the third-highest total fight time in division history, you know cardio is battle-tested. If they've never appeared on any leaderboard, you know they lack elite-level attributes.

How to use it: Spot outliers. Fighters with unusual statistical profiles (extremely high control time but low finish rate, high strike volume but low accuracy) reveal stylistic patterns. These outliers often create betting opportunities when matched against standard profiles.

Shurzy Tip: The Record Book is best for identifying what's genuinely elite versus what's merely competent. When everyone has "good" takedown defense, who has the best? The Record Book answers that question definitively.

Tier 2: Independent MMA Databases

Official UFC stats only cover UFC fights. These databases cover the entire MMA landscape, which matters enormously for evaluating prospects and cross-promotional moves.

Fight Matrix: Opponent Quality Matters

Fight Matrix provides objective rankings based on wins, losses, opponent strength, and recent performance across all MMA organizations. This is algorithmic ranking, not promotional narrative or fan voting.

Key features: Historical data spanning multiple promotions (UFC, Bellator, ONE, PFL, regional circuits), fighter profiles with complete fight history across all organizations, and sophisticated ranking methodology that weights opponent quality.

Why it's essential: Cross-promotional context. When a fighter arrives from Bellator with a 15-0 record, Fight Matrix tells you whether those 15 wins came against legitimate top-50 opponents or regional fighters who never won a significant bout.

More sophisticated ranking methodology than promotional rankings, which are often narrative-driven. The UFC ranks fighters based on marketability and recent performance. Fight Matrix ranks them based on mathematical win quality.

How to use it: Before betting any UFC debut, check the fighter's Fight Matrix ranking and opponent history. If they're ranked #87 globally despite being 15-0, their competition level was weak. If they're ranked #22 globally at 12-2, they beat legitimate talent.

Compare both fighters' historical rankings. Sometimes a fighter with a worse record actually faced better competition, which makes their statistical profile more reliable.

Shurzy Tip: The public sees records. You see opponent quality via Fight Matrix. When a 15-0 prospect faces a 9-4 UFC veteran, the public bets the undefeated record. You bet the quality of competition. That information asymmetry is systematic edge.

Tapology: The Comprehensive Database

Tapology provides comprehensive fighter profiles across all major and regional promotions, upcoming fight schedules, results, event coverage, and community rankings.

Key features: Detailed fight histories across global promotions, user predictions and discussion threads, event schedules including regional cards, and matchup history showing all previous meetings.

Why bettors use it: Researching regional prospects before UFC debuts. Understanding opponent quality in non-UFC fights. Tracking fighter activity levels (is this their first fight in 18 months?). Identifying camp changes that might signal tactical evolution.

How to use it: When a prospect debuts in the UFC, trace their entire career path through Tapology. Did they fight in strong regional promotions (Cage Warriors, LFA) or weak ones? Have they fought consistently or taken long layoffs? Did they switch camps recently?

Cross-reference opponent records. If someone beat five fighters who are now 2-8 in the UFC, those wins mean less than beating five fighters who went 6-3 in the UFC.

Shurzy Tip: Tapology's community rankings are worthless for betting. Ignore them. Use Tapology for fight history and opponent research, not for crowd-sourced opinions on who should be ranked where.

Sherdog: The Veteran Database

Sherdog's Fight Finder database contains records, opponents, and methods of victory and defeat across MMA history. It's been around longer than any other MMA database, which means it has the deepest historical records.

Key features: Complete fight records with method breakdowns (knockout, submission, decision), opponent details and their records at the time, event results and historical rankings, and filterable searches by promotion, weight class, and date.

Why bettors use it: Fast way to check how often someone wins or loses by knockout, submission, or decision and against what level of opponent. If a fighter has been knocked out three times in their career, Sherdog shows you whether those knockouts came from elite strikers or journeymen.

How to use it: Pattern recognition. Does a fighter get submitted repeatedly? Do they knock out weak opponents but go to decision against elite competition? These patterns predict future performance better than recent record alone.

Check opponents' records at the time of the fight, not their current record. Someone who beat a 12-0 prospect looks different when you realize that prospect is now 14-8 and never won another significant fight.

StatsFight: Modern Analytics Platform

StatsFight combines modern analytics with traditional MMA databases. It provides career records, striking versus grappling breakdowns, takedown percentages, control time, and fighter comparisons.

Key features: Internal "Stats Fight Rating" (0-100 scale) evaluating fighters across 100+ indicators, side-by-side fighter comparisons showing statistical advantages, live fight stats tracker for strikes, takedowns, submissions, and momentum, and clean modern interface that's easier to navigate than older databases.

Why bettors use it: Side-by-side comparisons save time versus manually stitching together data from UFCStats. Advanced metrics go beyond basic strike volume to show efficiency, damage output, and defensive responsibility.

How to use it: Before every bet, pull up both fighters in StatsFight and run the comparison. Which fighter has advantages in pace, accuracy, takedown offense and defense, control time, and finish rate? This visual comparison identifies mismatches faster than reading separate fighter profiles.

Use the Stats Fight Rating as a sanity check, not a betting decision. If two fighters rate 78 and 45, the market should reflect that gap. If it doesn't, investigate why.

Shurzy Tip: StatsFight is best for saving time, not discovering hidden edges. It aggregates the same data available elsewhere but presents it more clearly. Use it for efficiency, not for information the public doesn't have.

Tier 3: Advanced Tools for Sharp Bettors

These tools don't help you understand fighters. They help you understand the market.

BestFightOdds: The Line Movement Tracker

BestFightOdds.com shows live odds from many sportsbooks, opening versus current versus closing lines, and historical line movement graphs for every UFC fight.

Why it's essential: Line shopping saves money. Getting -180 instead of -200 on the same bet improves your long-term ROI by multiple percentage points. Tracking line movement reveals sharp versus public money. When 70% of tickets are on Fighter A but the line moves toward Fighter B, sharp money is on B.

Measuring closing line value (CLV). Did you beat the closing number? If you consistently bet -180 and the line closes -150, you're losing to the market. If you consistently bet +150 and the line closes +120, you're beating the market. Over hundreds of bets, CLV predicts profitability better than win rate.

How to use it: Before every bet, check BestFightOdds to find the best available number across all sportsbooks. After every bet, log where you bet versus where the line closed. Track your CLV monthly. If you're consistently losing to the close, your timing or bet selection needs adjustment.

Watch for reverse line movement. This is your clearest signal that sharp money disagrees with the public. Follow the sharps, not the crowd.

Shurzy Tip: If you're not tracking line movement, you're betting blind. BestFightOdds is free. Use it on every single bet. Getting 20 cents better on every bet compounds to massive ROI improvement over hundreds of bets.

Advanced Data Tools for Power Users

Kaggle UFC datasets provide downloadable fight and odds datasets for modeling and backtesting. These are machine-learning-ready datasets with every UFC fight from approximately 2010 to present.

StatsFight app offers modern interface combining stats, fantasy modes, and predictive analytics. Fight Analytics provides B2B data feeds with historical and live stats plus odds feeds and risk management tools.

When to use advanced tools: Only after mastering the basics. Most bettors would get better ROI spending time watching tape and taking notes than building machine learning models. Advanced tools amplify your existing process. They don't fix a broken process.

How to Combine These Tools Systematically

The power isn't in any single database. It's in layering them to answer questions the public never asks.

Pre-fight research workflow:

Start with UFCStats.com for baseline numbers on both fighters. Check Fight Matrix for opponent quality context (were those stats against elite or weak competition?). Use Tapology to verify activity level, camp changes, and complete fight history. Pull up StatsFight for side-by-side comparison to identify clear statistical advantages. Check BestFightOdds for current market price and line movement.

The questions you're answering:

What happened? (UFCStats). Against whom? (Fight Matrix, Tapology). Is it improving or declining? (UFCStats trends over last 5 fights). What does the market think? (BestFightOdds). Where's the gap between reality and pricing?

The lean setup for serious bettors: UFCStats plus Fight Matrix plus Tapology plus BestFightOdds cover 90% of needs. Add StatsFight if you want faster comparisons. Add Kaggle datasets if you want to push into modeling and advanced analytics.

Shurzy Tip: Don't collect tools for the sake of having tools. Master UFCStats and Fight Matrix first. Add complexity only when you've maximized what the core databases provide. More tools don't create edges. Better use of existing tools creates edges.

Conclusion

The best UFC stats websites solve different problems. Official UFC databases (UFCStats, Record Book) provide raw numbers. Independent databases (Fight Matrix, Tapology, Sherdog) provide opponent quality context. Advanced tools (BestFightOdds, StatsFight) provide market insights and efficiency.

Start with the core: UFCStats and Fight Matrix. Add Tapology for prospect research. Add BestFightOdds for market intelligence. Build from there based on what your betting style requires. The infrastructure compounds over time. The notes you take today become edges years from now.

‍