Should the NBA Get Rid of Conferences? What That Does to Futures

The Geographic Case Is Already Broken

The strongest version of the anti-conference argument is purely about product quality. The current system produces Finals matchups that are predetermined by geography rather than earned by performance.

When a 42-win Eastern team makes the Finals simply by surviving a weak conference while a 56-win Western team exits in the second round, the "championship" narrative is diminished. The 2023 Miami Heat's Finals appearance, achieved with 44 wins while the Denver Nuggets won 53, is the canonical example of how conference protection degrades the championship's credibility.

Adam Silver's expansion announcement implies that geographic realignment is coming regardless:

• Adding Las Vegas and Seattle as franchises requires redistributing teams between conferences
• The current imbalance (15 teams per conference) would shift to 16
• This creates the political opening for a broader structural conversation about whether conferences should be rebranded, restructured, or eliminated entirely

The economic case for conferences is dead. The political case is the only thing keeping them alive.

Before tip-off, jump into Gridzy and test your NBA IQ.

The Three Realignment Scenarios and Their Betting Implications

Scenario modeling produces three realistic outcomes with distinct betting implications.

Scenario 1: Conferences maintained with realignment. Las Vegas enters the West, Seattle the East (or vice versa based on existing balance). Minor conference title odds movement. Market impact: minimal, one additional team per conference slightly compresses playoff odds for current bubble teams.

Scenario 2: Conferences renamed/restructured into four divisions, top-16 seeded. This is the likeliest "bold" outcome, keeping geographic divisions for scheduling purposes while eliminating conference-specific playoff brackets. Market impact: massive. Conference title futures as a product disappear. Eastern Conference championship markets, currently generating significant betting handle because of the Knicks, Celtics, and Cavaliers fan bases, would be replaced by "Finals appearance" markets. Books would lose one of their most commercially successful pre-season prop markets.

Scenario 3: Full conference elimination, pure merit seeding. The nuclear option. Market impact: unprecedented. Every futures product that references "conference" would need to be rewritten:

• "Eastern Conference Futures" (a product that generates substantial handle from the New York and Boston markets) would become obsolete
• Sportsbooks would transition to "Top-8 seed" and "Top-16 seed" futures, which have no historical precedent and no existing player base of bettors
• The first two seasons of a no-conference world would be the most chaotic futures market environment in NBA betting history

Want smarter picks without diving into spreadsheets? Hit the Content Lab for NBA betting angles, trends, and quick reads built for real fans.

The Conference Title Market Is Massive and Vulnerable

To understand why conference elimination matters for bettors specifically, consider the scale. Eastern Conference championship futures consistently generate among the highest handle of any non-Finals NBA wagering product.

The Eastern market contains New York City, Boston, Philadelphia, Miami, and Chicago, the five largest sports betting cities in America. Any bettor in these cities naturally gravitates toward their local team's conference championship odds.

Eliminating that market doesn't just restructure the odds, it eliminates the emotional anchoring that drives recreational betting:

• A Knicks fan won't bet on "Knicks to finish as the 3-seed" with the same enthusiasm they'd bet on "Knicks to win the Eastern Conference"
• The narrative container matters to recreational bettors
• The Eastern Conference championship is one of the most emotionally loaded narratives in the sport

Books know this, which is why their lobbying position (unofficial but very real) is that conferences persist because they are one of the most commercially productive structural features of the sport from a wagering perspective.

If NBA's off tonight, Piggy Arcade keeps the action rolling.

What Conferences Are Hiding in the Current Futures Board

The most important analytical point about today's futures market is that conference protection is systematically embedded in every price on the board.

When you see the Cleveland Cavaliers at +1,100 and the Houston Rockets at +700, part of that gap is explained by talent, but part is explained by the fact that the Cavaliers' path to the Finals runs through a weaker Eastern Conference while Houston must navigate OKC, Denver, and the Lakers.

Strip conferences away, and the Cavaliers' title odds should probably lengthen by 200 to 300 basis points, and the Rockets should compress by a similar amount:

• Eastern Conference teams are systematically overpriced because their path to the Finals is easier
• Western Conference teams are systematically underpriced because their path is harder
• Books don't fully correct for this because they build their models on historical title probability data, which was itself generated under the conference system

This is the most actionable insight for sophisticated futures bettors in the current market. When you're comparing teams across conferences, always apply a "conference path difficulty discount" to Eastern Conference teams and a "conference path difficulty premium" to Western Conference teams before making your probability assessments.

If you're calling upsets in this article, go run it back in Gridzy.

The Model Lag When Conferences Disappear

If the NBA ever eliminates conferences, the first two seasons under the new system would create the most exploitable betting environment in modern NBA history.

Books would be running models built on conference-era data. Eastern Conference teams would be priced based on their historical playoff performance against East opponents. Western Conference teams would be priced based on their performance against West opponents.

But suddenly, a Knicks team would be facing Denver in the second round instead of another East team:

• The historical data used to price the Knicks would be irrelevant
• Their odds would be too short because the model assumes an East path
• Western Conference teams' odds would be too long because the model assumes a West path

Sharp bettors who understand this structural shift before the books fully adjust would clean up. The inefficiency would last at least two full postseasons before books recalibrated their baseline assumptions.

No games on the slate? Switch lanes and check Piggy Arcade's top picks.

The Bottom Line on Conference Elimination

The NBA won't eliminate conferences anytime soon. Eastern Conference owners have too much political power and too much to lose financially.

But expansion creates the opening for restructuring. If the NBA adds Las Vegas and Seattle, watch for hints about whether conferences get renamed, restructured into divisions, or eliminated entirely.

If conferences disappear, the futures market would experience the most disruptive structural change in NBA betting history. Conference title markets would vanish. Eastern Conference teams' championship odds would compress. Western Conference teams would see their odds shorten.

The model lag in Year 1 and Year 2 would create massive exploitable inefficiencies. Books would be pricing based on historical conference data that no longer applies. Sharp bettors who understand the structural shift would dominate.

For now, the edge is understanding that Eastern Conference teams are always slightly overpriced in the current market. When you're comparing teams across conferences, always discount the East and premium the West. The arbitrage sits in backing Western Conference teams at equivalent or better odds than their Eastern Conference counterparts.

If you're betting this series, don't guess. The Content Lab has the matchup breakdowns ready.