What Happens If You Only Bet Underdogs for an Entire NBA Season?

Betting Only Underdogs Is Too Blunt Without Filters

The problem with "only bet underdogs" is that not all underdogs are created equal. Some underdogs are undervalued by the market. Most are correctly priced or overpriced.

The data shows wide dispersion in underdog ATS performance. Some teams cover well as underdogs (OKC before this season, the Pistons before their breakout). Others are terrible as underdogs (tanking teams, injury-depleted rosters).

If you're betting every underdog without selection criteria, you're betting bad underdogs as often as good underdogs:

• Bad underdogs are correctly priced by the market
• Good underdogs are systematically undervalued
• Without filters, you're paying vig on a coin flip

The "always dogs" strategy needs selection rules to work. Otherwise, you're just paying vig to chase chaos.

Before you lock that parlay, check the Content Lab. We already did the homework.

The Smarter Version: Dogs Plus Numbers

A smarter version is "dogs plus numbers," not "dogs always." Focus on underdogs with rest advantage, opponent on back-to-back, line movement against heavy public tickets, or inflated brand-name favorites.

The filters that make underdog betting profitable:

• Rest advantage (underdog is rested, favorite is on a back-to-back)
• Opponent fatigue (favorite is on a road trip or playing their third game in four nights)
• Line movement against public tickets (favorite is getting 70%+ of tickets but the line hasn't moved or has moved toward the dog)
• Inflated brand-name favorites (Lakers, Knicks, Celtics get overbet because of brand, not because of actual edge)

Without these filters, you're just betting underdogs because they're underdogs. That's not a strategy. That's gambling.

Think you know ball? Prove it in Gridzy. It's free. It's fast. And yes, your group chat will see it.

Line Shopping Is Essential for Underdog Betting

If you're betting underdogs all season, line shopping becomes essential. A half-point difference on an underdog line can be the difference between profit and loss.

Example: You want to bet the Pistons +7. One book has them at +7. Another book has them at +7.5. The extra half-point changes your implied probability by approximately 2 to 3%.

Over an entire season, that 2 to 3% edge compounds:

• If you bet 100 underdogs at +7 and cover 48 times, you lose money
• If you bet 100 underdogs at +7.5 and cover 50 times because of the extra half-point, you break even or make a small profit

Line shopping every underdog bet is the single highest-ROI activity available. It requires no additional analytical work and consistently produces 2 to 5% improvement in long-term returns.

Taking a night off from the hardwood? Piggy Arcade has this week's top slot and table picks ready.

The Public Overvalues Brand-Name Favorites

The most consistent underdog edge is fading inflated brand-name favorites when the public is overconfident.

The Lakers, Knicks, and Celtics get overbet because of brand recognition, not because of actual analytical edge. When the public hammers these teams, the line inflates beyond fair value.

The filters that make this profitable:

• Brand-name favorite is getting 70%+ of public tickets
• Line has moved 2+ points toward the favorite because of public volume
• The favorite is on a back-to-back or road trip (fatigue compounds the overpricing)
• The underdog is rested or at home (rest advantage creates a wider talent gap)

This isn't "always bet underdogs." This is "bet underdogs when the public has overpriced the favorite." That's where the edge lives.

If you're calling upsets in this article, go run it back in Gridzy.

What Actually Happens If You Bet Every Underdog

If you bet every underdog for an entire NBA season without filters, you'll probably lose money. The math doesn't support it.

Underdogs hit at roughly 50% ATS across the league. Some teams are better. Some teams are worse. But on average, underdogs are a coin flip. You need 52.4% to beat -110 vig and break even.

Without filters, you're not getting to 52.4%:

• You're betting bad underdogs (tanking teams, injury-depleted rosters)
• You're betting correctly priced underdogs (the market knows they're underdogs for a reason)
• You're paying vig on every bet

The only way "always underdogs" works is if you layer in selection criteria: rest advantage, opponent fatigue, line movement against public tickets, inflated brand-name favorites, and line shopping every bet.

No games on the slate? Switch lanes and check Piggy Arcade's top picks.

The Bottom Line on Betting Only Underdogs

Betting only underdogs for an entire season sounds like a contrarian strategy, but the math doesn't support it without filters.

Underdogs hit at roughly 50% ATS on average. You need 52.4% to beat -110 vig. Without selection criteria, you're not getting there. You're betting bad underdogs as often as good underdogs.

The smarter version is "dogs plus numbers." Focus on underdogs with rest advantage, opponent on a back-to-back, line movement against heavy public tickets, or inflated brand-name favorites. Line shop every bet to squeeze out an extra 2 to 3% edge.

If you're betting every underdog without filters, you're just gambling. Add filters, line shop, and focus on underdogs with structural advantages. That's where the value lives.

If you're betting this series, don't guess. The Content Lab has the matchup breakdowns ready.