UFC

UFC Betting Explained: How to Use UFC Analytics for Predictions

Using UFC analytics for predictions means turning fighter stats into a repeatable process. You quantify who wins minutes in their preferred area, convert that to win probability, and only bet when the numbers and odds disagree by a meaningful margin. Analytics won't remove variance. You'll still lose bets. But they tilt things in your favor over hundreds of bets, not just one card. That's the difference between gambling and investing.

February 19, 2026

UFC Betting Explained: How to Use UFC Analytics for Predictions

Analytics won't remove variance. You'll still lose bets. But they tilt things in your favor over hundreds of bets, not just one card. That's the difference between gambling and investing.

Build a Core Stat Snapshot

Before you can predict anything, you need data. Start by pulling stats from UFCStats.com and boiling each fighter down to a simple profile. This is your foundation.

Striking stats to pull:

SLpM (significant strikes landed per minute)
SApM (significant strikes absorbed per minute)
Striking differential (SLpM minus SApM)
Striking accuracy
Striking defense

These numbers tell you who usually wins stand-up minutes. A fighter with +2.5 striking differential rarely loses decisions because they're banking rounds on volume.

Grappling stats to pull:

Takedowns per 15 minutes
Takedown accuracy
Takedown defense
Submissions per 15 minutes
Control time

These numbers tell you who dictates where the fight takes place and for how long. A wrestler with 4.5 takedowns per 15 minutes at 50% accuracy against a striker with 62% takedown defense will complete 3-4 takedowns. That's the fight right there.

Outcome history to check:

Finish rates (KO/TKO, submission)
Decision tendency
Round-by-round trends

This tells you whether they're minute-winners, finishers, or coin-flip chaos merchants. A fighter who wins 80% of their fights by decision should not be priced the same as a fighter who finishes 80% of the time.

Most predictive model work and betting guides agree on this: striking differential, takedown defense, and control time are the highest-signal stats. Reach, height, and raw career record are much weaker on their own.

Shurzy Tip: Pull stats for both fighters' last 5 fights separately from career averages. Recent form predicts better than decade-long numbers. A fighter's stats from 2019 mean nothing if their last 5 fights show completely different patterns.

Map Styles and Matchups

Numbers only make sense inside a style matchup. Stats tell you what each fighter does. Style matchups tell you whose game plan actually works. This is where you turn data into predictions.

Figure out where each fighter wants the fight

Look at the stats you just pulled and answer these questions:

High SLpM, low takedown usage, good takedown defense? That's a striker
High takedowns per 15 minutes and control time? That's a wrestler or grappler
Balanced stats across striking and grappling? That's a hybrid

Once you know what each fighter is, you can map the matchup. Striker versus striker means the standup stats matter most. Striker versus grappler means takedown defense versus takedown offense decides everything.

Figure out who can force their fight

Compare takedowns per 15 minutes versus takedown defense. Compare striking differentials. The fighter with the clearer edge in one phase and the ability to drag it there usually owns the matchup.

Example breakdown:

Fighter A: 5.2 SLpM, 2.8 SApM, 78% takedown defense (striker)
Fighter B: 2.8 SLpM, 3.5 SApM, 4.2 takedowns per 15 minutes at 48% accuracy (wrestler)

Who wins? Can the striker keep it standing? 78% takedown defense is solid but not elite. The wrestler shooting 4+ times per fight will complete 2-3 takedowns. If the wrestler holds 120+ seconds per takedown, that's 4-6 minutes of control. The wrestler banks 2 of 3 rounds through position. Fighter B should be favored.

Figure out how that translates to scoring

Different styles win rounds differently:

Control-heavy wrestler with big top time wins decisions
High-volume striker with large differential wins stand-up rounds
Low-volume knockout artist produces volatile outcomes hard to price as big chalk

Modern machine-learning work clusters fighters into "prefers striking" versus "prefers wrestling/BJJ" versus hybrids, then shows that style plus core metrics predicts outcomes better than stats or labels alone.

Shurzy Tip: The fighter who can force the fight where they want it usually wins. A wrestler who can't get takedowns against elite defense loses. A striker who can't keep it standing against volume wrestling loses. Geography decides the fight.

Turn Analytics into Win Probabilities

With the matchup mapped, use analytics to estimate win chances before looking at odds. You can do this informally or with actual models.

Manual estimation approach

Use simple heuristics based on the edges you identified:

Big edge in striking differential plus solid takedown defense: 60-70% win range in striker versus striker fights
Big edge in takedowns per 15 minutes plus control time versus poor takedown defense: 60-70% range in grappler-favored matchups
Even stats, coin-flip stylistic fit: 50-50

This isn't scientific but it's structured. You're estimating win probability based on measurable advantages, not vibes.

Model-based approach

Public machine learning projects and academic papers show ensembles built on SLpM, SApM, striking accuracy, takedown stats, age, and style can hit roughly 60-65% accuracy. Some hobbyist models report 75-80% on recent test sets, though those numbers should be treated cautiously.

The best-performing models weight striking differential, takedown defense, and control time heavily. They treat reach and height as minor factors. You should too.

Shurzy Tip: Don't overcomplicate this. If a fighter has clear advantages in 3 of 5 key stats (striking differential, takedown offense, takedown defense, control time, finish threat), they probably have 60%+ win probability. If stats are even, it's 50-50. If they're losing 3 of 5 categories, they're probably 40% or less.

Compare to Odds and Hunt Value

Now compare your analytic view to the market. This is where analytics become betting edges.

Convert moneyline odds to implied probabilities

The math is simple:

Favorite: (Negative odds) / (Negative odds + 100)
Underdog: 100 / (Positive odds + 100)

Examples:

-200 favorite implies 66.7% win probability
+180 underdog implies 35.7% win probability

Line up your estimate against market probability

If you estimated 65% win probability for Fighter A but the line implies 58% (-140), you have edge. The market is underpricing your fighter by 7 percentage points.

If you estimated 65% but the line already implies 70% (-230), you're paying a premium. Pass.

Size your bets based on edge size

Different edge sizes demand different approaches:

10%+ edge: max bet within your bankroll system
5-10% edge: standard bet size
2-5% edge: small bet or pass depending on confidence
Under 2% edge: pass, line is efficient

Use analytics-heavy tools and dashboards (pre-fight win probabilities, live model feeds, historical closing line versus result data) to spot recurring misprices. Books undervalue wrestlers in decision-heavy divisions. They overprice knockout artists with poor defense. These patterns repeat.

Shurzy Tip: Serious bettors often end up betting only one in three fights on a card, sometimes fewer. Those are the spots where model versus market disagreement is large enough to justify exposure. If you're betting 8 of 10 fights, you're not finding edges. You're gambling.

Layer Context on Top of Numbers

Analytics provide the foundation but you need context to avoid traps. Before you fire, protect yourself from model blind spots.

Check strength of schedule

Stats built on weak opponents collapse against ranked fields. Pull opponent records for both fighters' last 5 fights. If one fighter has been crushing regional fighters while the other has been fighting ranked opponents, their similar stats don't mean the same thing.

A fighter with +2.5 striking differential against unranked opponents might drop to +0.8 against ranked competition. That's normal regression to elite-level competition.

Weigh recent form and damage

Age, layoffs, recent knockouts, and camp changes can all degrade the predictive power of historical stats:

Fighters 33+ with high SApM and recent knockouts have cracked chins
Multi-year layoffs after injuries mean timing and reflexes are uncertain
Camp changes mid-career can improve or destroy performance

Check for these red flags before trusting the numbers.

Monitor weigh-ins and late news

Bad weight cuts, last-minute injuries, and short-notice replacements often matter more than small statistical edges:

Fighter looks gaunt at weigh-ins: downgrade by 5-10%
Short notice (under 3 weeks): massive uncertainty, demand plus money
Opponent change in last week: matchup analysis is now invalid

Late information can override your entire analytical process. Always check weigh-ins and news before you bet.

Shurzy Tip: Analytics tell you what should happen if both fighters show up as expected. Context tells you if they'll actually show up as expected. You need both.

Putting It All Together

Here's the complete prediction pipeline from data to bet:

Pull core stats for both fighters (striking differential, takedown stats, control time)
Map the style matchup (who wants what, who can force their game)
Estimate win probability based on advantages (manual or model-based)
Convert market odds to implied probability
Compare your estimate to market (looking for 5%+ edges)
Layer in context (strength of schedule, recent form, weigh-ins)
Bet only when edge is clear and context confirms

This process won't make you perfect. It will make you systematically less wrong than the average bettor. Over hundreds of bets, that compounds into profit.

Example in practice:

Fighter A versus Fighter B. You pull stats. Fighter A has +2.2 striking differential, 82% takedown defense. Fighter B has 2.8 takedowns per 15 minutes at 42% accuracy, moderate control time.

Style matchup: Striker versus wrestler. Can the striker keep it standing? 82% takedown defense is good. The wrestler will complete 1-2 takedowns but probably not enough to win rounds.

Win probability estimate: Fighter A 60% (striking advantage, solid defense).

Market odds: Fighter A -140 (58.3% implied probability).

Edge: 1.7 percentage points. Small but positive.

Context check: Fighter A's last 5 opponents were all ranked. Stats are real. Fighter B coming off 8-month layoff. Weigh-in looked fine.

Decision: Small bet on Fighter A. Edge is modest but context supports it.

That's the process. Stats to identify advantages. Matchup analysis to project how it plays out. Probability estimate to quantify it. Odds comparison to find value. Context to confirm or reject.

Final Thoughts

Analytics don't guarantee wins. They give you probability advantages that compound over hundreds of bets. Start simple. Pull striking differential, takedown defense, control time. Map the style matchup. Estimate who has the edge. Compare to market odds. Bet when you have 5%+ advantage. Pass when you don't.

Track everything. After 50-100 bets you'll see patterns. Your process gets sharper. Your edge gets clearer.

â€

Share this post: