NFL

Super Bowl LX Betting Guide: Historical Super Bowl Betting Trends

Historical Super Bowl betting data shows a fairly balanced picture: favorites, underdogs, Overs and Unders have all had their runs, and no single simple trend has been a long-term goldmine. Understanding super bowl betting trends requires recognizing patterns while avoiding the trap of treating past results as predictive systems. Historical nfl betting analysis reveals market efficiency more than exploitable edges. This is your guide to Super Bowl betting history and what it means for Championship Sunday.

February 9, 2026

Trend #1: Favorites vs Underdogs (All-Time Record)

All-Time Super Bowl Record:

Favorites straight-up: 36-18 (66.7% win rate)
Favorites against the spread: 28-24-2 (53.7% cover rate)

Favorites win more often (67%) but only cover slightly more than half the time (54%). The 13% gap between SU and ATS shows spreads are well-calibrated by books.

Underdogs had strong recent run: 4 of 5 underdogs covered spread, including outright wins by Bucs, Rams (as closing dog), Chiefs (twice as dog), and Eagles.

Don't blindly bet underdogs because of recent trend. Super bowl betting trends show market efficiency - when underdogs cover 4 of 5, books adjust future lines to compensate.

If Patriots are +3 underdogs vs Rams in Super Bowl LX, that +3 already incorporates recent underdog success. Market has adjusted.

Shurzy Tip: All-time favorites are 28-24-2 ATS (53.7%). That's basically a coin flip. Don't bet sides based on "favorites always cover" or "dogs always cover." Neither is true historically.

Trend #2: Overs vs Unders (Scoring Patterns)

All-Time Super Bowl Total Record:

Overs: 27-26 all-time (50.9%)
Essentially a coin flip over 50+ years

Early Super Bowls (1960s-1990s) often had lower totals (38.5-42.5). Since 2004, closing total has been 43.5 or higher every year, reflecting offensive evolution.

Unders cashed in 4 of 6 games, including high-profile "expected shootouts" that went Under:

Bucs-Chiefs LV (total 56, actual 40)
Rams-Bengals LVI (total 48.5, actual 43)
Eagles-Chiefs LVII (total 51, actual 73 - massive Over outlier)

Trend #3: Line Ranges and Competitive Balance

Historical Spread Distribution:

1980s-1990s: Double-digit favorites common

49ers -18 vs Chargers (XXIX)
Bears -10 vs Patriots (XX)
Washington -7 vs Broncos (XXII)

2000s-Present: Tighter spreads reflecting parity

Last 16+ Super Bowls: All spreads under 5 points
Most common range: -2.5 to -3.5
Pick'em games increasingly common

NFL parity increased dramatically. Dominant dynasties (49ers, Cowboys) gave way to more balanced league. Books price Super Bowls tighter because talent gaps narrowed.

Massive Historical Upsets:

Jets over Colts (Super Bowl III): Colts -18, Jets won outright
Giants over Patriots (XLII): Patriots -12.5, Giants won outright
Broncos over Packers (XXXII): Packers -11.5, Broncos won outright

Championship Sunday Application:

Modern Super Bowls rarely feature 7+ point spreads. If you see Rams -7 over Broncos, that's historically rare and suggests either massive talent gap or market inefficiency worth investigating.

Understanding historical nfl betting reveals that 3-point spreads are most common, making half-point positioning around key numbers (3, 7) more valuable than ever.

Trend #4: Line Movement Patterns

Teams with line movement in their favor (opening -2.5, closing -3.5) performed modestly better ATS in some samples, but not enough to be automatic system.

Championship Sunday Reality:

Sharp money (Sunday-Tuesday): Moves lines 1-2 points based on models
Public money (Thursday-Sunday): Moves lines 0.5-1.5 points toward favorites/Overs

Bet with sharp money early (when line moves against public bias), or bet against late public money (when line inflates favorites/Overs).

Historical Example:

Super Bowl LI (Patriots-Falcons):

Opening: Patriots -3
Early sharp money: Patriots -3.5 (sharps liked Patriots)
Late public money: Patriots -2.5 (public bet Falcons comeback narrative)
Result: Patriots won 34-28 in OT, covered -2.5 easily

Sharps were right early, public reversed line late, sharps got even better number.

Trend #5: Prop and Novelty Historical Patterns

Coin Toss:

Historically exactly 50/50 on heads/tails and which team wins. Books price at -110 both sides (4.5% hold) knowing it's pure 50/50 event with zero skill edge.

Exotic Props (Low-Probability Events):

Overtime: Occurred once in 50+ Super Bowls as of mid-2020s (~2% hit rate), yet "Yes OT" routinely draws public action at +800-1000

Safety: Occurred in ~8 of 56 Super Bowls (~14%), priced at +300-400

Defensive TD: Occurred in ~25 of 56 Super Bowls (~45%), priced at +140-180

What This Tells Us:

Books shade "Yes" on exotics because public loves longshots. Actual hit rates vs implied odds create negative EV on most novelty markets.

Championship Sunday Application:

If you must bet exotic props, focus on those with measurable historical rates (defensive TD at 45%, 2-point attempts at 30-35% in modern era) rather than pure novelty (Gatorade color has zero historical edge).

Understanding super bowl betting trends for props means focusing on football-driven markets with trackable base rates, not entertainment novelties.

Trend #6: Public Betting Patterns (Heavy Bias)

Historical Public Biases:

Overs: Public bets Overs 58-62% of time across all Super Bowls
Favorites: Public bets favorites 62-68% of time
Star players: Public hammers props on Mahomes/Brady types regardless of price

Market Adjustment:

Books know these biases and shade lines accordingly:

Totals inflated 1-2 points above neutral
Favorites inflated 0.5-1 point above neutral
Star player props inflated 5-10 yards above neutral

Contrarian Success Rate:

Historical data shows betting against public (Unders, underdogs, unpopular players) has 52-54% success rate over large samples - not huge edge, but consistent small advantage.

Championship Sunday Application:

If 75% of public bets Rams -2.5, consider Patriots +2.5. If 68% of public bets Over 52.5, consider Under 52.5. Contrarian positions create line value via public bias.

Trend #7: Key Numbers (3 and 7 Dominance)

Historical Landing Patterns:

NFL games landing on 3: 15% of all games (most common margin)
NFL games landing on 7: 9% of all games (second most common)
NFL games landing on 3 or 7: 24% combined

Super Bowl Specific:

Last 20 Super Bowls, 12 landed within 1 point of 3 or 7 (60% hit rate).

Half-Point Value:

Getting +3 instead of +2.5 = 9% better win probability
Getting +7 instead of +6.5 = 8% better win probability

Championship Sunday Application:

If you can choose between Patriots +2.5 at -110 or Patriots +3 at -125, paying extra juice for +3 is worth it historically. That half-point matters 1 in 11 games.

Understanding historical nfl betting patterns around key numbers creates tangible betting value in tight spreads.

Trend #8: Coaching and Playoff Experience

Historical Coaching Records:

Belichick (Patriots): 6-3 in Super Bowls, covered 5 of 9 as favorite
Reid (Chiefs): 2-2 in Super Bowls, covered 3 of 4
McVay (Rams): 1-1 in Super Bowls, covered both appearances

Historical record for first-time Super Bowl coaches: 14-26 SU (35% win rate), 17-22-1 ATS (43% cover rate)

If Mike Macdonald (Seahawks, first-time SB coach) faces Sean McVay (Rams, 2-time SB coach), historical trends slightly favor McVay. But this is correlation, not causation - talent matters more than résumé.

What Historical Trends DON'T Tell You

Mean Reversion is Real:

When underdogs cover 5 straight Super Bowls, market adjusts future lines. The "trend" becomes priced in, eliminating edge.

Sample Sizes Too Small:

56 Super Bowls isn't enough data for statistical significance on many props. Don't build strategy around "Unders are 4-2 in last 6" - that's noise, not signal.

Market Learns Quickly:

Any simple historical angle (like "always bet dog") gets arbitraged away once widely known. Super bowl betting trends that work get eliminated by market efficiency.

Matchup-Specific Factors Matter More:

Patriots-Broncos specific matchup analysis (OL vs DL, red-zone efficiency, turnover margin) creates more edge than "dogs covered 4 of last 5 Super Bowls" generic trend.

Best Use of Historical Trends

Use trends for context, not strategy:

Knowing Overs/Unders are 50/50 all-time helps you avoid false confidence
Knowing key numbers matter helps you pay up for half-points
Knowing public biases exist helps you identify contrarian value

Don't use trends as betting system:

"Dogs covered 4 of 5 recently" is not reason to bet Patriots +3
"Unders hit 4 of 6 recently" is not reason to bet Under 52.5
These patterns are already priced into current lines

Build edges from specific analysis:

When analyzing super bowl betting trends for Championship Sunday, use history to frame expectations (spreads tight, totals 48-53, key numbers critical), then build actual betting positions from matchup-specific work (QB rankings, OL/DL matchups, red-zone efficiency).

Final Thoughts on Historical Super Bowl Trends

The main actionable lessons from historical nfl betting analysis are: no simple trend (always bet dog/favorite, always bet Over/Under) stays profitable long-term, favorites win 67% but cover only 54% (spreads well-calibrated), totals are coin flip all-time (50/50), recent 16+ Super Bowls all under 5-point spread (parity era), and key numbers (3, 7) matter more than ever.

For bettors today, understanding super bowl betting trends means using history as context for market efficiency, not as predictive system for Championship Sunday. Price, matchup, and timing matter more than old trend sheets.

‍

Share this post: