UFC Betting Explained: Grappling Styles (BJJ, Wrestling, Judo, Sambo)

Grappling decides far more UFC fights than most casual bettors realize, and that ignorance is exactly where your edge lives. Everyone bets the knockout artist. Nobody wants to bet the wrestler who grinds out boring decisions. But wrestlers win. A lot. And within grappling itself, there are four distinct games being played: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, wrestling, judo, and sambo. Each wins in different ways, at different tempos, with different finish profiles. 

Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ)

BJJ focuses on ground fighting, positional control, and submissions. Chokes, joint locks, armbars, triangles. It emphasizes working from guard, half guard, mount, and back control, methodically advancing to dominant positions and finishing with submissions.

Read more: The Complete Guide to UFC Fighters & Fighting Styles

Characteristics in MMA:

• Comfortable off the back (dangerous guard game that wrestlers don't have)
• Wide submission arsenal (chokes, armbars, triangles, leg locks, kimuras)
• Positional patience (willing to give up short-term damage for long-term control)
• Less emphasis on takedowns (often relies on pulling guard or counters)

Betting implications: BJJ specialists have higher submission finish probability than average when they can get meaningful ground time. Against wrestlers who like top control but have average submission defense, BJJ "sub" props can be severely undervalued. The market sees "wrestler" and prices for decision, completely ignoring the submission threat from bottom.

Against elite defensive wrestlers they can't drag down, they often lose slow decisions. Overs and opponent-by-decision become more attractive because the BJJ fighter can't get the fight where they want it.

Shurzy Tip: When a BJJ black belt with 15 submission wins faces a wrestler, bet submission at +400 or higher. Market prices it like a wrestling match, ignoring that submissions happen from bottom position too.

Read more: Best Grapplers in UFC History

Wrestling (Folkstyle/Freestyle)

Wrestling prioritizes takedowns, top control, and pinning opponents down rather than submissions. In MMA, it becomes the engine for positional dominance and ground-and-pound. Wrestlers dictate where fights happen, which is the single most powerful advantage in combat sports.

Characteristics in MMA:

• High-level takedowns (doubles, singles, body locks, trips)
• Ability to dictate where the fight happens (standing or on the mat)
• Emphasis on riding time and mat returns (standing opponents up and re-taking them down)
• Typically less submission-oriented than BJJ
• Creates opportunities for ground strikes that accumulate damage

Research shows UFC bouts that go to decision usually involve more takedown attempts and stand-ups than fights ending by KO or submission, highlighting how wrestling-heavy approaches correlate with decisions.

Betting implications: Wrestlers often drive "fight goes the distance" and over-round outcomes, especially in 3-round fights. Decision method-of-victory for strong wrestlers is frequently mispriced versus their moneyline, particularly when they lack proven finishing ability.

Pure striking opponents with mediocre takedown defense are consistently overvalued by the public against elite wrestlers. When the market sees "exciting striker" versus "boring wrestler," casual money floods the striker. That's exactly when the wrestler offers value.

Example: Striker with 70% takedown defense versus elite wrestler with 85% takedown accuracy. Striker is priced -150 (favorite) because casual money loves strikers and knockouts. But wrestler takes them down 1-2 times per round, controls 5 minutes per round, wins 2 of 3 rounds minimum. Wrestler at +130 is massive value the market completely misses.

Shurzy Tip: If you see an elite wrestler fighting a striker with less than 75% takedown defense, bet the wrestler every time. Market underprices wrestling so consistently it's basically free money.

Read more: Grappling Styles (BJJ, Wrestling, Judo, Sambo)

Judo

Judo emphasizes throws, trips, and balance-breaking, plus pins and submissions once the fight hits the mat. In MMA it appears mostly as clinch takedowns: hip throws, foot sweeps, and sacrifice throws, especially against the fence where space is limited.

Characteristics in MMA:

• Upper-body takedowns from the clinch (uchimata, harai goshi, foot sweeps)
• Strong balance and clinch control
• Transition immediately from throw to dominant positions (side control, mount)
• Historically less common as a primary base
• Often blended with BJJ or wrestling

Betting implications: Judoka who can reliably get upper-body entries and fence clinches often surprise pure strikers who prepared mainly for leg-shot takedowns. They're expecting doubles and singles, not hip throws.

Their throws can create sudden positional swings. One clean throw can go straight to side control or mount, which spikes submission or ground-and-pound finish probabilities immediately.

Books and bettors tend to "see" only classic wrestling shots when pricing takedown props. Upper-body judo entries are under-accounted for, leading to soft control-time and takedown markets for good judoka.

Example: Fighter A (judo background) versus Fighter B (striker who trained for wrestling takedowns). Market prices them evenly because B has "good takedown defense" (against wrestling shots). But A gets upper-body clinch throws that B never trained for. Control time props and takedown props are mispriced because the market only accounts for doubles and singles.

Read more: Hybrid Styles (MMA-Integrated Systems)

Sambo

Sambo (especially combat sambo) blends judo throws, wrestling-style takedowns, leg locks, and positional grappling, often integrated with strikes. Dagestani fighters like Khabib Nurmagomedov and Islam Makhachev are prime examples of sambo-heavy games adapted perfectly to MMA.

Characteristics in MMA:

• Heavy emphasis on chain-wrestling (combining shots, trips, and throws until the opponent is grounded)
• Strong top control, fence mat returns, and "ride" positions
• Fast, aggressive submissions including leg locks and upper-body chokes
• Early experience in rule sets that already mix striking and grappling
• Translates smoothly to UFC competition

Analyses of sambo versus BJJ note that BJJ generally offers a wider submission arsenal, whereas sambo tends to have a stronger combination of throws and wrestling-style control.

Betting implications: Sambo-based fighters often show both high takedown volume and meaningful submission threat, which boosts both decision and inside-the-distance chances. They can win either way, which the market struggles to price.

Markets sometimes misclassify them as "wrestlers" only, underpricing their submission path. Sub props on sambo fighters can be soft, especially against tired or one-dimensional strikers who have never faced this style.

Because they are comfortable initiating clinch and shot entries at all times, live-betting opportunities emerge whenever you see the opponent's takedown defense collapsing under sustained pressure.

Example: Sambo fighter versus striker. Market prices it like a wrestling match (decision likely). But sambo fighter has both control ability and submission threats. Betting submission at +350 or higher offers value because the market only prices the wrestling half of their game.

Shurzy Tip: When you see a Dagestani fighter with a sambo background, bet both decision and submission props. They can win either way, and the market usually only prices one path.

Read more: How Styles Clash in UFC Fights

How Grappling Styles Interact in Matchups

Wrestler vs. BJJ Specialist

Wrestler's goal: Stay on top, avoid submissions, rack up control time for judges.

BJJ goal: Create scrambles, attack from guard, use sweeps and submissions.

Historically, fights that end in submissions show more submission attempts, chokes, and locks per round, while wrestling-heavy decisions show more takedown attempts and stand-ups with fewer submissions tried.

Betting angles: If the wrestler has demonstrated solid submission defense and posture, wrestler-by-decision and over-rounds gain value. If the wrestler has weak sub defense or habitually leaves neck or arms exposed, BJJ submission props become extremely attractive.

Example: Wrestler with average submission defense versus BJJ black belt. Market prices wrestler to win by decision (they control top). But BJJ fighter catches submission from bottom or in transition. Betting BJJ by submission at +400+ offers massive value because market ignores bottom-position submission threats.

Sambo/Judo vs. Pure Wrestler

Sambo or judo fighter often has better throw variety and clinch takedowns, plus submissions. Pure wrestler may have better leg-attack entries and riding positions.

Because sambo integrates both standing throws and aggressive submissions, sambo fighters can out-scramble traditional wrestlers and attack legs and neck in transitions.

Betting angles: Markets that focus only on double-legs and singles (classic wrestling) can misprice takedown totals and control-time props when the sambo or judo fighter's throw game is strong.

In fields with multiple "wrestlers," sambo-based fighters often end up with more dominant submissions and finishes than lines suggest because they have more weapons.

Grappler vs. Striker

Regardless of whether the grappler is BJJ, wrestling, judo, or sambo-based, the core question is always the same: Can the grappler reliably bring the fight to the mat and hold it there long enough to matter?

Empirical work on MMA grappling shows that more takedown attempts and stand-ups per round are associated with decisions, while higher submission attempt rates obviously correlate with submission finishes. Heavy ground control reduces standing strike exchanges and thus KO risk.

Betting angles: Grappler with strong takedown game versus striker with mediocre takedown defense means overs and "grappler by decision" or "grappler by submission" are typically where value lives, not the striker by KO that casual bettors love betting.

If the striker has elite takedown defense and scrambling ability, grappler's edge shrinks dramatically. Moneylines and method-of-victory props need to be adjusted down from "wrestler crushes striker" defaults.

Shurzy Tip: The most consistent edge in UFC betting is betting grapplers against strikers with sub-75% takedown defense. Market systematically overprices the striker because knockouts are sexy. Reality: wrestler wins by boring decision.

Read more: Style Matchups That Create Betting Value

Practical Betting Takeaways by Style

BJJ-first fighters: Target submission props when they face wrestlers or grapplers who willingly go to ground but have shown defensive lapses. Fade them in decisions versus disciplined top-position wrestlers who rarely expose their neck or arms.

Wrestling-first fighters: Default expectation is control and decisions, especially in 3-round fights. Overs and decision props are often undervalued in markets dominated by KO-minded bettors who don't understand grappling.

Judo-influenced fighters: Look for underpriced clinch and throw-based control against strikers who prepared mainly for leg takedowns. Control-time overs and "fight goes the distance" can gain value because judo throws create control without finishing quickly.

Sambo hybrids: Treat them as wrestling plus submissions with dangerous transitions, not just grinders. Both decision and submission paths need to be in your model, especially when facing opponents with limited grappling depth.

Read more: Best Strikers in UFC History

Conclusion

For UFC betting, grappling style isn't just trivia. It directly shapes pace, round structure, finishing probability, and judges' scoring patterns, all of which drive value in moneylines, totals, and props.

BJJ specialists hunt submissions from any position. Wrestlers control and grind. Judoka throw and dominate. Sambo fighters do everything. Each creates different betting opportunities that the market consistently misprices because casual bettors only understand striking.

The biggest edge? Markets systematically overprice strikers and underprice grapplers. Everyone wants to bet the knockout. Nobody wants to bet the boring wrestler who grinds out decisions. That gap between what's exciting and what actually wins is where your money lives.

‍