UFC Betting Explained: Parlays Explained

Parlays are the betting world's double-edged sword. They magnify both your edge and your losses, turning a $100 bet into $500 or watching it evaporate to zero based on a single leg failing. Most casual bettors build parlays for entertainment, chasing lottery-ticket payouts. Most professional bettors avoid parlays entirely, recognizing that juice compounds and kills long-term ROI. But there's a middle ground: strategic parlays that combine independent edges into mathematically sound combinations. This guide explains how UFC parlays work, when they actually make sense, and when they're just an expensive way to lose money faster.

What Is a Parlay?

A parlay is a single bet combining two or more selections, where all legs must win for the entire parlay to pay. One loss kills everything.

How it works:

• All legs must win for the entire parlay to pay
• Odds multiply together
• A single loss loses the entire bet
• You get amplified payouts if all legs hit

Simple example:

Bet 1: Fighter A Moneyline at -150
Bet 2: Fighter B Moneyline at -110

Standalone payoffs:

• Fighter A at -150: Risk $150, win $100, total return $250
• Fighter B at -110: Risk $110, win $100, total return $210

Parlay:

• Risk $100 on both
• Convert odds to decimal: Fighter A = 1.67, Fighter B = 1.91
• Parlay odds: 1.67 × 1.91 = 3.19
• Payoff: $100 × 3.19 = $319 total return ($219 profit)

Both bets must win. If either loses, the parlay loses the entire $100. That's the fundamental tradeoff: higher payout, zero forgiveness.

Shurzy Tip: If you're making a parlay because "the payout looks sick," you're not betting. You're playing lottery tickets with worse odds.

Read more: The Complete Guide to UFC Betting Types & Markets

The Juice Multiplier: Why Parlays Are Mathematically Dangerous

Here's the core problem that most casual bettors never understand: juice compounds across legs.

A single -110 moneyline has 4.5% juice built in. Two -110 moneylines multiplied together have much more than 4.5% total juice. The math gets brutal fast.

Mathematical breakdown:

Single leg at -110:

• Implied probability both sides = 52.4% each
• Overround (juice) = 4.5%

Two legs at -110 each:

• Combined true probability = 0.524 × 0.524 = 27.5%
• Books pay you like it's a 25% event
• True juice on 2-leg parlay = approximately 9%

Three legs at -110:

• Combined true probability = 0.524³ = 14.4%
• Books overprice it relative to payout
• True juice on 3-leg parlay = 13-15%

The more legs you stack, the worse your juice situation becomes. By the time you hit 4-5 legs, you're paying 20%+ juice to the book even if every leg is fair individually.

This is why even if you have slight edges on each leg, parlaying them often creates a net negative EV bet. The juice eats your edge alive.

Read more: How Round Betting Works

When Parlays Make Sense (Rare)

Parlays are only sensible in very specific situations that most bettors never encounter.

Combining Independent Edges Across Unrelated Fights

You've identified three separate edges in three different fights with no correlation to each other. Different fighters, different metrics, independent outcomes.

Example:

• Fighter A over 25 strikes at +100 (you think 60% likely)
• Fighter B by submission at +200 (you think 35% likely)
• Fighter C wins Round 1 at -110 (you think 55% likely)

Individual EVs:

• Bet A: 60% true × (+100) = +60 cents profit per dollar
• Bet B: 35% true × (+200) = +70 cents profit per dollar
• Bet C: 55% true × (-110) = +6 cents profit per dollar

Parlay EV:

• True probability all three hit: 0.60 × 0.35 × 0.55 = 11.55%
• Fair odds for 11.55% event: +766
• Book hangs you +450 (built-in juice on the parlay)

Here's the problem: the individual bets have positive EV, but the parlay does NOT. You're better off placing three separate bets because the juice on the parlay kills your combined edge.

Correlated Same-Game Parlays (Rarely)

Some books allow parlays within a single fight. Fighter A moneyline + Fighter A over 25 strikes. These are correlated (if Fighter A wins decisively, strikes go up).

A book might offer you moneyline at -150, Over strikes at -120, and parlay at +250. If both legs have independent positive EV and the book's parlay pricing is generous, a same-game parlay can make sense. This is extremely rare because most books underprice correlated parlays.

Shurzy Tip: Same-game parlays only work when both legs have genuine independent edge AND the book miscalculates the correlation. That's maybe 1% of all same-game parlays offered.

Read more: How Method of Victory Betting Works

Common Parlay Structures (And Why They Don't Work)

The "Sports Bettor" 3-Leg Parlay

Pick 3 moneylines, parlay them, dream of 6-8:1 payout.

Problem: Each moneyline has 4.5% juice. Three legs compound to approximately 13% total juice. You need to be right on all three picks AND beat the juice. Most casual bettors are wrong on 30-50% of picks. Parlaying amplifies losses.

Expected outcome: Lose money over time.

The "Hedge My Main Bet" Parlay

Bet Fighter A to win at -200. Round 1 they're winning. You parlay them (now -400) with Fighter B at -150 to amplify the payout.

Problem: You've now locked yourself into needing Fighter B to win too. If Fighter B loses and Fighter A wins, you win your original A bet (profit $50 on $200) but lose the parlay (lose $100 on $100). Net: Lose $50 instead of win $50. That's a terrible hedge. Real hedging reduces variance, not increases it.

The "Entertainment" Multi-Game Parlay

Stack 5 fights' moneylines for a "fun" ticket. The juice is so heavy (20%+) that you need to predict 5 fights nearly perfectly and still barely break even.

Expected outcome: Lose all $100 eventually, feel entertained for about 12 minutes until leg 3 fails.

Read more: Prop Bets Explained

When NOT to Parlay

Understanding when to avoid parlays is more valuable than knowing when to use them.

Skip parlays when:

• You don't have independent edges on every leg
• Any single leg has a juice deficit (you need >55% true probability to justify -110)
• You're "hoping" rather than modeling
• You haven't backtested your predictive accuracy on similar parlay combinations
• You're trying to amplify a winning day into a huge day
• You're chasing losses from earlier bets

Most of the time, the answer to "should I make this parlay?" is no. If you have genuine edges on multiple bets, you make more money betting them separately.

Building a Strategic (Rare) Profitable Parlay

If you insist on building a parlay, here's the only intellectually honest approach.

Step 1: Only include legs with clear positive EV

Calculate true probability for each leg individually:

• Leg A: You estimate 65% true, market is 52.4% (-110) = +5.4% edge ✓
• Leg B: You estimate 58% true, market is 52.4% (-110) = +5.6% edge ✓
• Leg C: You estimate 48% true, market is 52.4% (-110) = -4.4% edge ✗

Only parlay A and B. Leg C is negative EV on its own. Including it tanks the whole parlay.

Step 2: Verify Independence

Ensure the legs are genuinely independent:

• Fighter A winning AND Fighter B winning = independent ✓
• Fighter A over 25 strikes AND Fighter A winning = correlated ✗
• Fighter A by KO AND Fighter B by decision = somewhat independent ✓

If legs are correlated, parlay math becomes messy. You're better off betting them separately.

Step 3: Calculate Parlay EV

Leg A: 65% true, Leg B: 58% true

Parlay true probability: 0.65 × 0.58 = 37.7%

Fair odds for 37.7% outcome: +165

Book prices parlay at +200? You get +35 cents edge per dollar wagered. Book prices parlay at +140? You have negative EV. Skip it.

Step 4: Unit Size

If both individual legs are positive EV at 1 unit each, the parlay should be smaller: Individual bets 2 units each, parlay 0.5 units. You're getting exposure to the upside of both hitting, without over-committing to the parlay's higher juice.

Read more: Live Betting Markets

Same-Game Parlays: The Exception?

DraftKings, FanDuel, and other books now offer "Same Game Parlay" markets where you can combine multiple props/bets from a single fight into a parlay.

Example: Fighter A moneyline + Fighter A over 25 strikes + Round 1 KO

Books artificially adjust parlay odds to account for correlation. Sometimes these are positive EV, sometimes not.

When SGPs might work: Book prices the SGP generously (over fair correlated value), you have a strong read on a fighter's dominance where high strikes + KO are likely together, and you only include legs with genuine edge.

When to avoid SGPs: Book prices them like -110 moneylines (heavy undervaluation), you're guessing at correlation, or juice is 15%+ on the parlay itself.

The Professional Parlay Approach

Most professional bettors don't build parlays at all. Here's why parlays are -EV even when individual legs have edges.

Juice costs compound aggressively. Even with positive EV individual legs, the combined parlay often has worse juice than playing them separately. You can achieve similar upside exposure by increasing unit size on individual positive EV bets.

Example comparison:

Option 1: Parlay 1 unit on A + 1 unit on B. Payoff if both hit: approximately 3:1

Option 2: Bet 3 units on A + 3 units on B (both at +EV). Payoff if both hit: 3 units profit on A + 3 units profit on B = 6 units profit total. Payoff if only A hits: Still 3 units profit (parlay loses everything).

Option 2 provides upside exposure while reducing variance. Parlays increase variance without proportional upside. This is the fundamental flaw in parlay logic.

Parlay Mistakes UFC Bettors Make

Treating parlays as lottery tickets: "I'll throw $20 on a 5-leg parlay because why not." Because you're paying massive juice for entertainment.

Including legs you haven't researched: "Fighter C is probably going to win" doesn't justify a parlay leg. Every single leg needs modeling.

Mixing correlated outcomes: Fighter A winning + Fighter A by KO are highly correlated. Including both in a parlay inflates perceived payout but the actual probability is lower.

Increasing parlay size after losses: Losing a 2-leg parlay and chasing it with a 5-leg parlay is emotional betting at its worst.

Not comparing to separate bets: "The parlay pays +300" sounds good until you realize betting each leg separately at fair prices pays more with lower variance.

Ignoring juice entirely: "Both bets hit 60% and 55% of the time, so the parlay hits 33% of the time, and +200 is fair." No. You're ignoring that +200 may only be fair for 35% events (due to juice), making it negative EV.

Conclusion

Parlays are mathematically dangerous because juice compounds across every leg. A 2-leg parlay at -110 on each side carries approximately 9% juice instead of 4.5%. A 3-leg parlay carries 13-15% juice. By the time you hit 4-5 legs, you're paying 20%+ juice even if every individual leg is fair.

Parlays only make sense when: You have genuine positive EV on every single leg, all legs are independent (not correlated), the parlay pricing is generous relative to combined probability, and you size appropriately (smaller than individual bets).

Most of the time: You make more money betting edges separately rather than parlaying them. The upside of a parlay (amplified payout) doesn't compensate for the downside (compounded juice, zero forgiveness for one wrong pick).

If you're building parlays for entertainment, at least be honest about it. You're gambling, not betting. And that $20 five-leg parlay? You're not "almost hitting it." You're donating to the sportsbook's quarterly earnings while feeling like you're in action. Professional bettors skip parlays almost entirely because the math doesn't work. Follow their lead.

‍